Photo Credit: JD Hancock via Compfight
Economists will tell us that a free market system is the most efficient way to exchange goods (and even wellbeing) within a society. Using the money of markets, we place values on the things that we have and the things that we want, giving people an easy way to trade things they want less for things they want more. For the most part, everyone wins in a free market economy.
But are there some things that, due to their nature, should be beyond the markets? Are there things that should not be bought and sold? This is the question that Harvard Professor Michael Sandel asks in his new book, “What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets.”
One example in the book is the use of blood banks to monetize blood giving. An economist would argue that creating a market for blood actually adds to the virtue of the system because it increases individual choice and freedom. In other words, if someone still wants to donate blood for free, they can. But if they prefer to sell their blood, they now have this option too. And theoretically, this should make more blood available to those in need, as blood can be received from people with different motivations.
But sociologist Richard Titmuss looked at this issue by comparing the UK system of blood collection (donor only) to the monetized American system and found the former to be far superior. The introduction of economic incentives led to fewer blood donations rather than more. In fact, Titmuss says the outcome of a monetized system yields not only a lower quantity and quality of blood, but a “declining spirit of giving [that] made for an impoverished moral and social life.”
Commercializing blood changes the meaning of donating it . . . Is donating a pint of blood at your local Red Cross still an act of generosity? Or is it an unfair labor practice that deprives needy persons of gainful employment selling their blood?
Photo Credit: Wout via Compfight
The sale of human blood is not the only example in Sandel’s book where markets might change the moral fabric of our society: the buying and selling of human organs, the purchase of life insurance policies on employees by Walmart and other large corporations (creepily named “dead peasants” insurance,) buying carbon credits to pay for the right to pollute, or buying the rights to kill an endangered animal such as the black rhino, just to name a few.
There are other more subtle ways that economic market thinking changes the fabric of our society in ways that, if we do not pay attention, could change who we are as a species. Some schools, for example, have begun paying their students to read books. And Sandel gives numerous examples of how wealthy people are allowed to pay to “jump the queue”—for example paying a premium to drive in the carpool lane in some states, paying for premium medical services that allow greater, more personalized access to medical treatments, or bypassing the security lines in airports with their first class tickets.
Photo Credit: Bart via Compfight
Some would argue that the wealthy have earned their rights to these conveniences. But others might say that when the rich indulge in these privileges, they are taking something away from the rest of us. Airport security checkpoints, for example, are a burden of national security that should be shared by all. And reserving one or two lanes for the wealthy means the less affluent wait will be extended. One small way that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
Some of these examples seem frivolous, such as the wealthy hiring “line-standers” to hold their spot at “free” Shakespeare performances in Central Park. This has the potential to shut out the less affluent from an experience which is intended to be a public service for all.
More serious, is the example of lobbyists who hire line-standers (sometimes homeless people) to secure their spots in congressional hearings when important legislation is being discussed. Government by the people and for the people . . . as long as you can afford to get in.
The free market system works well and we applaud its efficiency. We complain when government gets in the way and slows things down. But maybe, sometimes, we need to be slowed down. If only to be given enough time to think about the kind of civilization we want to create and to consider if everything that can be bought and sold should be.
References and recommended reading:
Sandel, M. J. (2012). What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
by Jeremy McCarthy
Connect with me on facebook, twitter, or pinterest.
Now available: New e-book on The Psychology of Spas and Wellbeing.
There’s always so much great food for thought on your blog, Jeremy! You’re definitely becoming a serious thought leader. One day, I’ll be sending everyone to watch your TED talk, I’m sure! And very much looking forward to it! 😉
Perfect that you conclude with the need to slow down here Jeremy! There is an economic organization that is promoting just that idea. Slow Money. I wrote about them in my blog post ‘Will Spa take root in an ecological economy?’ almost exactly this time last year 2011 (http://www.visionsparetreat.com/2011/10/spa-ecological-economy.html). Slow Money presents some really practical, earth-based ideas for making ‘a transition from an economy based on extraction and consumption to an economy based on preservation and restoration’. This month 2012, inspired by Slow Money, something called Soil Trust has been launched http://www.soiltrust.org/. Since Spa and Wellness often advocate slowing down, taking time, etc. – all things Slow (including new economic ideas) would be a grand association don’t you think? Thanks for continuing to take up challenging subjects and expanding perspectives.
Come to australia